Musings of the Angry Webmaster - Latest Comments

Re: And another Obama crony goes belly up

Angry Webmaster — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:18:26 -0000

You know, you were doing so well until that last sentence. You just demonstrated that you are a typical liberal as opposed to a thoughtful liberal. (Typical liberals scream "RACISTS" when they don't have an argument. Thoughtful liberals don't)

Regarding the F22. We need a replacement for our current fighter force. The designs are over 40 years old. Technically, the F22 is terrific, but it ran into the standard problem of design. A committee got a hold of it and instead of a race horse, we got a camel. The F35 is even worse.

Take the basic airframe, strip off everything not needed to get it into the air and then start adding only what is required, (Rather than nice to have), for the mission.

Now back to your left win racism. You obviously, like most trolls from the left, haven't bothered to go through this site. Mrs. Webmaster is Chinese. I was hoping Herman Cain might win the presidency. Gee, I think he might be black?

I like Rep. Allen West and do see him as a potential president. Then there is Bobby Jindal, governor of Louisiana. I would like to see him in the White House too.

But, none of these men are are on the liberal democrat plantation so of course in your mind, they are nothing.

Re: And another Obama crony goes belly up

Questionman — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:35:25 -0000

Kodak filed for bankruptcy, too. Is that also the President's fault?
Like many businesses, this one proceeded on the assumption that it understood the market. It didn't. That's why it, like many businesses, foundered. The company failed to anticipate the "competing battery developers in China and South Korea, which generally have a lower cost manufacturing base [and lower labor and raw material costs]" (according to Alex Sorokin, CEO).In other words, the company made the classic mistake of not getting to know its competition.The investors – including the Government – are entitled to be livid. However, risky start-ups are just that: risky.If you want to complain about politicians who throw money at problems, start by talking about the F-22 Raptor...

People say all these awful things about Obama b/c at it’s core they HATE the fact that a Black man (technically bi-racial, but by Amerikkka’s racial calculus, one drop of Black blood makes you Black) is in the White House.

Re: Romney won’t repeal Obamacare

earlenegriner — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:26:43 -0000

Good people can turn into bad people when they get power, and what about bad people?

Re: Obama screws America, Part 134

Johnny Rotten — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:06:32 -0000

Uuhhhbama isn't a Communist? Is that so! Then what did you call it when Emperor Hussein Obamugabe confiscated of the Chrysler bondholders' property and handed the loot to his UAW cronies in June 2009... hmmm? Got no idea where you were indoctrinated, but REAL Constitutional scholars call that a painfully obvious violation of the Fifth Amendment's just-takings clause. They don't teach that at your daily Komsomol meeting, do they?

Re: Stuff liberals say

Tom Kratman — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:51:11 -0000

Oh, and this was a fun one, last night: http://theweaselking.livejourn...

Re: Stuff liberals say

Tom Kratman — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:49:47 -0000

COUNTDOWN: H Hour. Working on it, even as we speak.

Re: Stuff liberals say

Angry Webmaster — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:38:41 -0000

Greetings Mr. Kratman. I see your intelligence service is working perfectly. I think I have your rules elsewhere on the site, but it's nice to have them right from the source.

I'm impatiently awaiting your next book.

Re: Stuff liberals say

Tom Kratman — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:13:10 -0000

The Left's 20 Rules of Racism:

1. If you believe that general
intelligence exists, is heritable and at all testable for, you're a
racist.

2. If you point out that liberal philosophies and programs
intended to have a good impact have had a disproportionately bad impact on the
ethnicities targeted by liberals, you're a racist.

3. If you notice that
other cultures have some problems, you're a racist.

4. If you notice your
own culture has had some successes, you're a racist.

5. If you try to
identify subcultural problems, you're a racist. If the problems existed or got
worse under liberalism, see item 2, above.

6. If you're mainstream
American culture, and don't hate that culture, you're a racist.

7. If
you're capable of noting unpleasant facts about subcultures and discussing them
without your brain fogging, you're a racist.

8. If you won't kowtow and
grovel as soon as someone accuses you of racism for one of the reasons above or
below, you're a hopeless racist.

9. If you do not believe that mankind is
a tabula rasa for liberals to make
whatever they think would be good to make of man, this week, you're a
racist.

10. If you don't take personal responsibility for all the evils
of slavery, you're a racist. This is true even if you only arrived from Poland
last week.

11. If you're white, you're a racist.

12. If you're
white and just arrived from Poland last week and don't accept that you're a
racist, you're a racist.

13. If you try to interject logical thought into
a discussion of culture, you're a racist.

14. If you refuse to admit
culture is a racial matter, and a liberal wants to conflate the two, you're a
racist.

15. If you believe that race and culture are indistinguishable
and a liberal decides that you shouldn't conflate the two, you're a
racist.

16. If you believe that black or Hispanic girls who are paid by
liberal inspired programs from the age of 13 to have babies will have babies,
you're a racist.

17. If you believe that _any_ girls of whatever color
who are paid to have babies will then have babies but then, insensitively,
observe that a smaller percentage of white girls do, certainly because they
haven't been targeted for as much "help" from liberals, you're a
racist.

18. If it doesn't bother you that the truth offends liberals,
you're a racist.

19. If your name is Tom Kratman and you write and in
your writing your heroes and heroines tend to be from minorities while your
villains are white liberals, you're still a racist.

20. If you read The Bell Curve, you're a racist. On the other
hand, if you didn't read it but wrote a scathing review on Amazon anyway you
might not be a racist provided you take personal responsibility for 300 years of
slavery even if you just arrived from Poland last week.

Re: Obama screws America, Part 134

Ohio Right Wing Nut — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:33:56 -0000

WTF? Stop drinking Wiskey for breakfast? You know you can't drink all day if you don't start in the morning, Right? LOL

AW, this is the first time posting here, nice blog, lurked over here a couple times. keep it up

Re: Obama screws America, Part 134

Angry Webmaster — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:20:45 -0000

Hi there Cortney "Troll" Moore. Sorry, but I have been busy and other than approving your blithering idiocy for the world to see, haven't had the time to reply to you.

First, you don't know me. Second, you obviously haven't gone through the blog or the main site. Third, you didn't happen to notice the stuff I've posted on immigration and visas.

This leads me to believe that you are not aware that my wife is Chinese. You also don't seem to be aware, (of much), that my brother in-law is Hispanic. Finally, you might have missed my approval of Herman Cain and how I was hoping he would win the White House. (I like Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana, and Allen West, representative from Florida)

Now, for your viewing, I recently posted a video with commentary on Liberals. I didn't create the video, but the commentary is all mine. :)

Take a look and let us know if you agree with the views of the person in the video.

http://angry.net/blog2/?p=6358

Re: Obama screws America, Part 134

Gunsniper — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:31:28 -0000

A piece of advice for you Cortney, stop drinking whiskey for breakfast and you'll sound less like an idiot.

Re: Obama screws America, Part 134

Ohio Right Wing Nut — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:29:27 -0000

Just like a typical reactionary, braindead, liberal sheep. Never making an argument FOR your man, Barack, just "you are a poopy headed racist"
Do you not see how stupid you make yourself look?

Re: Obama screws America, Part 134

Cortney M — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:31:49 -0000

thanks for proving my point of you and your party's racism! @SeaFoamGreen, thanks for proving my point of you and your party's racism! I thought you Connies and T'baggers claimed to dislike corporate welfare. The funny thing is people like you think he's marxist, socialist, or,gulp, Stalinist even though he's proven to be nothing but a moderate who tried to appease conservatives way too much. "Obama is the worst President ever." Really? since when? 2009? There's at least 5 presidents objectively worse than Obama. That is not even an arguable fact. That statement is emotional and not based in factual comparisons.
Calling and elected President as the enemy of America shows only how sick in the head you racists are!
Soon, all of us, will have to decide between Obama and one of the Republican candidates. Well, Obama’s record is an open fact. What it is not is “socialist,” “Nazi,” “apologetic,” proof he “hates America,” “class warfare,” “elitist,” or any of all the other incongruous negatives the Republicans relentlessly screech. What it is is a weak, moderate state being sullied by lying racists. I can guarantee you that Obama isn't a Communist! The job collapse (which started at the end of those famous 8 lost years of GOP tax cuts for the filthy rich and a counterproductive trillion dollar war in Iraq) bottomed out at the beginning of 2010, as the Obama stimulus took effect. Since then, the US added2.4 million jobs”. Now go vote for “Mitt the jobslasher” rightard dumbos and enjoy another 8 lost years of GOP derstruction of the US economy!
You are an idiot … The Bush’s ruined this Country FOREVER … wake up and face it!! Racist!
I'm convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are all racist, bigoted, hate filled losers that can't stand having a black man as President of the United States!

Re: Marines hosing down dead Taliban

conservativeBC — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:01:17 -0000

HELP WILD BILL FOR AMERICA BEAT THE YOUNG TURKS

I think it is a noble cause

http://whopsucker.com/?p=2035

Re: And the destruction of America continues

VonZorch — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:22:02 -0000

Ron Paul would make an excellent Secretary of the Treasury. But certainly not a President.

Re: Well, this is..annoying

Angry Webmaster — Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:25:22 -0000

So you killed my favorite system? Batting a thousand this week aren't you?
Damn subterranean dwelling techno-troll

Re: Dept. of Homeland Security now monitoring web sites!

Rwolf — Sun, 15 Jan 2012 01:09:34 -0000

In Jan. 2010 it was reported Top Obama Czar Cass Sunstein supported infiltrating and spying on Americans, their groups and organizations to disrupt and neutralize Americans that spread conspiracy theories, including against U.S. Government. This would be accomplished in part by U.S. Government assets disseminating counter-information.

Interestingly, Cass Sunstein’s infiltration proposal appeared to resemble Rep. Jane Harman's "2007 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" HR 1955 that stressed, disrupting political and other groups without evidence of wrongdoing. Had Harman’s bill passed, U.S. Government would have the power to spy on and intimidate Americans from exercising their Constitutional Right to Free Speech and Association. Millions of Americans would fear supporting or attending any political and other “planned meeting” out of concern they might be labeled a terrorist or supporter of Home Grown Terrorism or Violent Radicalization.

Under Rep. Harman’s "2007 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" Government would only have to allege a group member “Thought about committing violence or damaging property” to label an individual or group “prone” to committing “Violent Radicalization or Terrorism. Activists who set up web sites promoting a “Planned Activity”; wrote, emailed or handed out "flyers" promoting a “Planned” event or demonstration could be alleged to have inspired Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism—even if not violence occurred. Demonstrators alleged by police to have blocked a roadway, intimidated drivers, shoppers, employees; anyone from entering or leaving a place could be accused of coercing government or its people. Under the Harmon legislation "Information flyers" NOT intended by the author to be distributed by a particular group or at a planned event—but somehow got distributed, could potentially open the door for government to charge the author promoted "Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism. Such concerns might have crushed written dissent.

The "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" mentioned, “any planned meeting or bodily act in America” against a U.S. foreign alley; no violence was required. For example: American labor unions, human rights and environmental organizations could potentially have been at risk under The "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" if they (planned or had meetings in America) to lawfully protest a foreign U.S. alley and or networked with or supported foreign activists that intended or protested a U.S. foreign alley. The Harmon bill appeared to criminalize constitutionally protected 1st amendment activities. Had the Harmon bill passed, U.S. Government, federal and state police would have had little difficulty terminating American activists and organizations exercising their Constitutional Right to Free Speech, Free Association and Expression. Police and Agent Provocateurs could easily destroy e.g. any anti-war group or organization by covertly joining a protest demonstration to instigate violence; or undercover police covertly contacting participants before, at or after a "planned" meeting or demonstration... (then lie) allege a group member committed or intended to commit violence in order that government could assert a group was ideologically based toward violence; supported "Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism. Although The 2007 "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" Failed To Pass, subsequently in 2012, Congress destroyed and diminished many of Americans’ Constitutional Rights upon Pres. Obama signing The National Defense Authorization ACT of 2012 (NDAA). Under NDAA, U.S. Government does not need probable cause or corroborating evidence to Indefinitely Detain Americans on U.S. Soil without charges if suspected of being involved in terrorism or posing a threat to National Security. Consequently Indefinitely Detained Americans have no right to legal counsel, a trial or Habeas Corpus.

Alarmingly Corrupt Police, Government Agents and Agent Provocateurs may too easily falsify reports and give false testimony see (COINTELPRO) to cause U.S. Government to disappear Americans; cause innocent U.S. Citizens to be swept off the street and indefinitely incarcerated based only on suspicion that someone is a terrorist or involved in terrorism. Note no actual planned, intended or violent act is required for U.S. Government to allege someone is involved in terrorism under (NDAA).

Re: These are grandmothers?

Porphyry — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:36:33 -0000

Maybe it's more a matter of *culture*. Rather than credit Brazil's water, I suspect there's something in (at least some of) the contestants: implants.

Re: These are grandmothers?

OldDog — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:18:36 -0000

Looks like money well spent to me Angry!

Re: These are grandmothers?

Angry Webmaster — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:00:09 -0000

This is what I pay you that massive amount of money to do all day? Sheesh! Well it's review time!!

Re: Dept. of Homeland Security now monitoring web sites!

pumabydesign001 — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:20:26 -0000

Allow me to share some poetic justice with you, "Simply too Good to Resist, Anonymous Hacks into Homeland Security and Leaks Watch List."

Re: Member of the greatest generation shows his greatness again

David Burkhead — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:24:31 -0000

I love a happy ending

Re: The Death of American Freedom

dcs2244 — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:21:46 -0000

It is unfortunate, but I think we are too far gone to settle these issues at the ballot box; the elites, elected and appointed, will never voluntarily surrender the power they have accrued. Our president blatantly ignores the constitution, and congress will not call him on it...in fact, Senator Scott Brown thinks it is just dandy.

The issue is states rights and limiting the federal government. I'm sure the progressives, republicrat and demican, thought they had settled that matter with the conclusion of The State's War. I reckon that the South will rise again...but this time it will not be a matter of geography.

Keep your powder dry.

Re: Dear Millionaire, How about donating your wealth to the Treasury?

Keith Glass — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:30:16 -0000

Gee, what a surprise. . . it's always other people's money, NEVER their own. . .

Re: Frank Miller blasts OWS morons

Toqeer Ahmad — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:02:11 -0000

Cool :P